296 and the Earth
Feb 27, 2021 21:19:34 GMT
Post by Admin on Feb 27, 2021 21:19:34 GMT
.
Note to self and readers: the values for " god " and " created " were accidentally transposed in the panel below
------------
There's a rather obvious approximate relationship between the nested totient function of the Genesis figurate ( 2701 ), the synodic month average, the cube root of the intercalary term 25,920, and the values obtained using the numbers from Genesis 1:1 and the Book of Revelation
To be clear - they are all approximately a month length
I think that they would have known that 2592 can be obtained either by dividing the term 25,000 by the powers of ten, or, alternately, by taking the totient product of the triangular figurate used to write Genesis 1:1
This is another bijection that would have been obvious by priests doing mathematical astronomy / analysis / astrometry, and thus likely part of a priestly corpus containing ephemerides
Note to self and readers: the values for " god " and " created " were accidentally transposed in the panel below
------------
Here I will show you another reason why I believe the mathematical knowledge of priests, during Chaldean ( Neo-Babylonian rule ), was used to write Genesis 1:1
The mathematical value of the word " earth " ( 296 ) in the verse is the focus of this thread, which is meant to reflect the use of figurate numbers in keeping time, discussed in my thread HERE
My guess is that this word value was derived from the mathematics associated with the prediction of eclipses / new moons and eclipse cycles like the Saros
This could technically be a type of " Kinematics " ( A subfield of physics, thought to have developed in modern classical mechanics, that describes the motion of points, bodies, and systems of bodies without considering the forces that cause them to move )
This type of prediction used the synodic month average
The mathematical value of the word " earth " ( 296 ) in the verse is the focus of this thread, which is meant to reflect the use of figurate numbers in keeping time, discussed in my thread HERE
My guess is that this word value was derived from the mathematics associated with the prediction of eclipses / new moons and eclipse cycles like the Saros
This could technically be a type of " Kinematics " ( A subfield of physics, thought to have developed in modern classical mechanics, that describes the motion of points, bodies, and systems of bodies without considering the forces that cause them to move )
This type of prediction used the synodic month average
By using the value of the " seal " ( 400 ) derived from the astrometry terms of Revelation ( 666 and 144,000 ), we can see that the constant of pi and the value for the word " month " from the flood narrative in Genesis link several crucial things
~ Eclipses ( " Floods " in Mesopotamian texts )
~ The mathematical constant of pi ( 3.14 )
~ The value of the word " earth " ( 296 )
~ Powers of ten
such that raising 3.14 to the power obtained by using the power of ten and the value of " earth " provides the approximate synodic month length used to predict eclipses
~ Eclipses ( " Floods " in Mesopotamian texts )
~ The mathematical constant of pi ( 3.14 )
~ The value of the word " earth " ( 296 )
~ Powers of ten
such that raising 3.14 to the power obtained by using the power of ten and the value of " earth " provides the approximate synodic month length used to predict eclipses
There's a rather obvious approximate relationship between the nested totient function of the Genesis figurate ( 2701 ), the synodic month average, the cube root of the intercalary term 25,920, and the values obtained using the numbers from Genesis 1:1 and the Book of Revelation
To be clear - they are all approximately a month length
These calculations are where I believe the value to have been obtained when writing the verse
I think that they would have known that 2592 can be obtained either by dividing the term 25,000 by the powers of ten, or, alternately, by taking the totient product of the triangular figurate used to write Genesis 1:1
This is another bijection that would have been obvious by priests doing mathematical astronomy / analysis / astrometry, and thus likely part of a priestly corpus containing ephemerides
